Clint A. Wilson

Theology of Suffering: A Biblical Framework for Crisis Response and Church Resilience 

Theology of Suffering — APA Web Format

Theology of Suffering: A Biblical Framework for Crisis Response and Church Resilience

Clint Wilson

School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University

CRIS609: Complex Trauma and Disasters: Offering Emotional and Spiritual Care

August 3, 2025

Abstract

This research explores the Christian understanding of suffering and its applied implications in the fields of crisis intervention and disaster response. Grounded in a biblically based worldview, it reflects upon the role of suffering as a redemptive process defined by endurance, hope, and restoration. With the presentation of a church-focused consultation model and a plan for disaster planning, the study defines proactive responses in regard to communication, safety, and spiritual care. When addressing the various challenges faced by clergy as well as congregations, the paper underscores the relevant role of faith-based resilience training, community involvement, and trauma-informed care practices. With the combination of academic research and scriptural foundations, it argues that the most successful response in the face of crises requires the combination of spiritual maturity, emotional insight, and organizational readiness. In this all-encompassing model, the church stands ready as a sanctuary of healing in the context of crises, while leaders find the capability for responsive ministry amid experiences of suffering.

Keywords: theodicy of suffering, dispositional preparedness for disasters, spiritual care, pastoral courage, crisis response, trauma-informed care practices

Theology of Suffering: A Biblical Framework for Crisis Response and Church Resilience

Suffering is the universal and so frequently bewildering experience that demands theological insight and realistic ministry. In the guise of individual catastrophe or social trauma or catastrophic disaster, suffering generates the most questions to the individual and to faith communities regarding the presence of God and even the goodness and intentionality of God. To the crisis interventionist and Christian ministry practitioner, an authentic and Bible-supported theology of suffering is not a possibility but a necessity. Otherwise, caregivers only dispense platitudes rather than comfort, and congregations are in no condition to be the fountains of resilient hope in the hour of crisis.

This paper examines suffering on a biblical basis and develops a theology of the sovereignty of God and his loving presence in suffering. Laying its argument on the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament Scripture and contemporary scholarship, it unpacks the ways in which suffering becomes redemptive, formative, and ultimately Christ-centered in his own suffering and resurrection. The essay then develops from the resulting theology a plan of approach to preparing for a visit from a local church to develop a plan for a pre-incident disaster response. The essay ends with practical recommendations for urging pastors and parishioners to develop emotional and spiritual resilience so that the church might survive but also minister effectively amidst suffering.

Biblical Theology of Suffering

Hebrew Bible Foundations

The Hebrew Bible provides a richly theological context in which suffering is not sanitized but entered into deeply. Suffering in the book of Job does not arrive as the direct result of sin but as divine permission for purposes beyond human understanding (Job 1:8–12, CSB). Job’s narrative resists the retributive reading and evokes faith in the mysterious lordship of God. Similarly, the Psalms—especially laments like Psalm 22—provide the lexicon of suffering faith, showing that laments of pain walk hand in hand with avowals of faith (Psalm 22:1–3, CSB).

This theology contains Isaiah’s own prophetic insight, especially in the Suffering Servant who “was pierced for our transgressions” and “crushed for our sins” (Isaiah 53:5, CSB). This foreshadows the redemptive role played by suffering in the mind of God, a role later more precisely defined in the New Testament.

New Testament Developments

The New Testament’s treatment of suffering is Christocentric. Not only does Jesus enter human suffering, he redemptively transforms it. His own death on the cross is the most striking paradox of God’s power being exerted through apparent weakness (2 Corinthians 13:4, CSB). Pauline theology emphasizes that suffering participates in conforming believers to the image of Christ: “Now if we are children, then we are heirs… if indeed we suffer with him so that we may also be glorified with him” (Romans 8:17, CSB).

As Pitre et al. (2019/2020) argue, Paul’s theology situates suffering within the pattern of Christ’s death and resurrection—not as mere penal endurance but as spiritual formation and eschatological anticipation. Peter adds that suffering proves and purifies faith (1 Peter 1:6–7, CSB), and Revelation assures believers that God will one day “wipe away every tear” (Revelation 21:4, CSB).

Theological Themes

God’s Sovereignty and Mystery

God’s will is not always clear when tragedy strikes, but his sovereignty becomes a reference point at the center of Christian experience. Such mystery does not cancel God’s goodness; it requires trust amid doubt. God’s sovereignty, according to Hunsinger (2021), becomes a lifeline for trauma-integrated spiritual care. In moments of severe loss, this foundation permits caregivers and survivors to situate suffering within God’s providence—offering presence over answers, comfort over explanations.

Suffering as Character Development

Martin Buber’s I and Thou suggests that genuine encounter with the Eternal Thou is often mediated through human relation and vulnerability (Buber, 1970/1923). Likewise, Paul testifies: “we rejoice in our afflictions, because we know that affliction produces endurance, endurance produces proven character, and proven character produces hope” (Romans 5:3–5, CSB).

Congregational and Missional Testimony

The church is renewed as it shares and bears one another’s burdens (2 Corinthians 1:3–7, CSB). Hunsinger (2021) emphasizes intersubjective compassion in trauma-informed care. Building on Figley’s compassion-fatigue work, Rivera et al. (2019) document the emotional toll of persistent exposure to others’ suffering among clergy and lay caregivers.

Eschatological Hope

Christian hope looks toward a future where God renews all things (Revelation 21:4–5). Paul reminds us, “the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is going to be revealed” (Romans 8:18, CSB). This is no escapism; it sustains endurance and frames pain within redemption.

Integration of Scholarship and Scripture

Christian theology treats suffering as more than evil to endure: it can mature faith, conform us to Christ, and enlarge compassion. Scripture does not command rejoicing because of suffering, but it witnesses to God’s redeeming presence in suffering—forming character and deepening dependence on him.

Personal Theology of Suffering

Forming a Personal Theology

A practical theology of suffering begins with the conviction that God is near in pain: “The Lord is near the brokenhearted; he saves those crushed in spirit” (Psalm 34:18, CSB). Trauma-informed spiritual care mirrors that nearness by creating emotional and spiritual safety (Tumminio, 2024).

Suffering can deepen intimacy with Christ—“to know him… and the fellowship of his sufferings” (Philippians 3:10, CSB). A mature theology embraces mystery, resisting simplistic explanations, as in God’s response to Job (Job 38–41, CSB).

Functional Views of Suffering

McMartin and Hall (2022) propose that suffering can foster spiritual maturity, Christ-identification, and prosocial action. Fortin (2021) adds that Christian joy may co-exist with suffering through trust in God’s purposes, resonating with Romans 5:3 (CSB).

Implications for Ministry

A theology of suffering must inform practice. Ministry “out of brokenness” is not weakness but the ground of authenticity. God “comforts us… so that we may be able to comfort” others (2 Corinthians 1:4, CSB). Such ministry offers presence and credible empathy.

Church Consultation and Disaster Preparedness

Theological Rationale for Preparedness

Stewardship frames preparedness. As Joseph planned for famine (Genesis 41, CSB), churches plan in faith, not fear. “God is our refuge and strength, a helper who is always found in times of trouble” (Psalm 46:1, CSB); the church should function as refuge in kind.

Step-by-Step Consultation Plan

Evaluate Risks and Vulnerabilities

Begin with a risk survey: identify likely hazards, assess facilities, and map needs of vulnerable groups (FEMA, 2013).

Creating a Crisis Communication Plan

Clear, simple communication sustains trust and reduces panic (Milstein, 2019). Define internal member alerts and external coordination pathways.

Organize emergency response teams (medical, logistics, shelter, security) with defined roles and recurrent training.

Leadership and Volunteer Training

Train staff and volunteers in trauma-informed care, ethical decision-making, and spiritual first aid (Kapucu et al., 2012). Build relationships with local emergency services and hospitals.

Faith-Based Collaboration and Public Role

Faith-based organizations often respond rapidly and reach vulnerable populations (Kapucu et al., 2012). Koenig (2006) describes the church’s “ministry of being there” as theological witness in crisis.

Pre-disaster partnerships prevent duplication and strengthen witness: “let your light shine before others” (Matthew 5:16, CSB).

Fostering Resilience in Pastors and Congregations

Clergy Resilience and Burnout Prevention

Pastors shoulder heavy emotional loads, especially in crisis. Resilience grows through rest rhythms, boundaries, spiritual practices, and peer support (Doolittle, 2007; Koenig, 2006). Reframing adversity theologically reduces shame and buffers burnout.

Trauma-Informed Ministry

Trauma-informed approaches prioritize safety, trustworthiness, empowerment, and collaboration (SAMHSA, n.d.). Pastoral leaders cultivate spiritually and emotionally safe spaces that avoid re-traumatization. Historically, FBOs are key responders in communal trauma (Kapucu et al., 2012).

Framework of Resiliency in Religious Spaces

Congregational resilience is communal: peer support, prayer partnerships, and shared rituals of hope and grief weave identity and endurance (Koenig, 2006).

Conclusion

In a fallen world suffering is neither unwilled nor unwatched by God. Rooted in the Hebrew Scriptures and fulfilled in Jesus, biblical theology treats suffering as redemptive and transforming. Such theology must shape practice: churches prepare with prudence and minister with mercy—building plans, equipping leaders, and nurturing resilient networks—living Psalm 46:1 (CSB): “God is our refuge and strength, a helper who is always found in times of trouble.”

References

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (R. G. Smith, Trans.). Charles Scribner’s Sons. (Original work published 1923)
  • Doolittle, B. R. (2007). Burnout and coping among parish-based clergy. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 10(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670600857591
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2013). Guide for developing high-quality emergency operations plans for houses of worship. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/developing-eops-for-houses-of-worship.pdf
  • Fortin, J.-P. (2021). At pains following and serving God: A contemporary theology of joy in suffering. The Heythrop Journal, 62(3), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.13317
  • Hunsinger, D. V. D. (2021). Trauma-informed spiritual care: Lifelines for a healing journey. Theology Today, 77(4), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040573620961145
  • Kapucu, N., Hawkins, C. V., & Rivera, F. I. (2012). Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge.
  • Koenig, H. G. (2006). In the wake of disaster: Religious responses to terrorism & catastrophe. Templeton Foundation Press.
  • McMartin, J., & Hall, M. E. L. (2022). Christian functional views of suffering: A review and theoretical overview. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 25(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2021.1968812
  • Milstein, G. (2019). Disasters, psychological traumas, and religions: Resiliencies examined. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 11(6), 559–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000510
  • Pitre, B. J., Barber, M. P., & Kincaid, J. A. (2019). Paul, a new covenant Jew: Rethinking Pauline theology. William B. Eerdmans.
  • Rivera, L., Pagaoa, M., Molinari, N.-A., Maldin Morgenthau, B., & LeBlanc, T. T. (2019). Preassessment of community-based organization preparedness in two sectors, human services and faith-based: New York City, 2016. American Journal of Public Health, 109(S4), S290–S296. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305141
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (n.d.). SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach.
  • Tumminio, D. E. (2024). Trauma-informed spiritual care: Interventions for safety, meaning, reconnection, and justice. Fortress Press.
  • Holman Bible Publishers. (2017). CSB study Bible. Holman Bible Publishers.